Denton Elem vs Nashoba
MT · 43 students • OK · 52 students • fiscal year 2024 • swap sides
In one line
- Nashoba spends 6% more per student than Denton Elem after adjusting for local price levels.
- Denton Elem directs 13 more cents of every operating dollar to instruction than Nashoba.
- Nashoba is far more dependent on local property taxes (73% of revenue vs 53%), which ties its budget more tightly to local property values.
- Denton Elem reports fewer students per teacher (6.1 vs 10.4). This is a staffing ratio, not an average class size.
Are these even comparable?
Establish the shape of each district before reading a single dollar figure.
| Denton Elem | Nashoba | |
|---|---|---|
| Students enrolled | 43 | 52 |
| Schools | 2 | 1 |
| Grades served | PK–8 | PK–8 |
| Setting | Rural | Rural |
| County | Fergus County | Pushmataha County |
| State | MT | OK |
| Local price level (US = 100) Above 100 means a dollar buys less here than the national average. | 94.6 | 87.8 |
The headline dollar
Current operating spending per student, shown three ways. The first is what each district reports. The second and third are the honest ones for comparison.
| Denton Elem | Nashoba | |
|---|---|---|
| Per student, as reported | $21,878 | $21,519 |
| Per student, price-adjusted Divided by the local price level, so both figures are in the same money. | $23,116 | $24,497 |
| Per student, price-adjusted, excluding transport Transportation provision varies enormously between districts and states. Removing it compares the parts both districts actually do. | $22,008 | $23,927 |
| Capital spending per student Buildings and land, never folded into the operating figures above. It is lumpy: a district mid-build looks expensive for two years. | Locked | Locked |
Denton Elem
Nashoba
Where the money comes from
The funding mix determines how exposed a district is to local property values, to state politics, and to federal programmes ending.
Denton Elem
- Local 52.7% Locked
- State 24.7% Locked
- Federal 22.6% Locked
Nashoba
- Local 73.0% Locked
- State 15.3% Locked
- Federal 11.8% Locked
| Denton Elem | Nashoba | |
|---|---|---|
| Local share of revenue Mostly property tax. A high share means school budgets track local property values, up and down. | 52.7% | 73.0% |
| State share of revenue | 24.7% | 15.3% |
| Federal share of revenue | 22.6% | 11.8% |
| Total revenue | Locked | Locked |
How MT funds its districts
We have not yet written up MT's funding formula, so nothing is claimed here.
How OK funds its districts
We have not yet written up OK's funding formula, so nothing is claimed here.
Where the money goes
The same slices in the same order for both districts, plus the differences by function — because two pie charts side by side hide exactly the thing you want to see.
Denton Elem
- Instruction 57.7% Locked
- Instructional staff support 1.4% Locked
- Student support 0.0% Locked
- Operations & maintenance 11.4% Locked
- Transportation 4.8% Locked
- Food service 8.4% Locked
- School administration 3.3% Locked
- District administration 6.2% Locked
- Other support 6.7% Locked
- Other current 8.4% Locked
Nashoba
- Instruction 45.2% Locked
- Instructional staff support 1.3% Locked
- Student support 5.6% Locked
- Operations & maintenance 20.3% Locked
- Transportation 2.3% Locked
- Food service 6.4% Locked
- School administration 4.2% Locked
- District administration 7.2% Locked
- Other support 7.1% Locked
- Other current 6.6% Locked
What is actually different
Share of each district's operating dollar, Denton Elem minus Nashoba. Two pie charts side by side are almost impossible to read against each other; this is the same data as one chart.
| Denton Elem | Nashoba | |
|---|---|---|
| Cents of each operating dollar reaching classrooms Instruction plus instructional staff support, as a share of current spending. | 59.2% | 46.5% |
| Administration share District office plus school administration. | 9.6% | 11.4% |
| Transportation share | 4.8% | 2.3% |
What the money buys
Staffing levels are the most direct thing a budget converts into.
| Denton Elem | Nashoba | |
|---|---|---|
| Students per teacher This is a staffing ratio: total enrollment divided by teaching staff. It is NOT average class size. Actual classes are larger than this number in every district. | 6.1 | 10.4 |
| Students per counselor | Locked | Locked |
| Students per administrator | Locked | Locked |
| Total salaries All staff, not teachers alone. | Locked | Locked |
Who they serve
The answer to "but they serve different kids" — which is usually a fair objection.
| Denton Elem | Nashoba | |
|---|---|---|
| Child poverty rate Children aged 5 to 17 in poverty within the district boundary. Used instead of free-lunch eligibility, which community eligibility has made unusable for comparison. | 32.6% | 32.4% |
| English learners | 0 | 0 |
| Students with disabilities | 0 | 0 |
| Enrollment change, 5 years | +79.2% | -10.3% |
Results, and results for the money
Stability and risk
The homebuyer’s real question: what is likely to change after I move in?
Denton Elem
- Federal cliff exposure More than 20% of revenue is federal, a share that is unusually exposed when temporary federal programmes end.
Nashoba
- Declining enrollment Enrollment fell more than 5% over five years. Enrollment decline is the single best predictor of school closures and programme cuts.
- Low share reaching classrooms Under 55% of current spending reaches instruction and instructional support, low against national practice.
| Denton Elem | Nashoba | |
|---|---|---|
| Enrollment change, 5 years | +79.2% | -10.3% |
| Long-term debt per student | Locked | Locked |
| Debt service share of spending | Locked | Locked |
Enrolling a child
Is a seat at your zoned school guaranteed?
Denton Elem
We have no such statement from this district — which is not the same as a promise that your zoned school has room. Most districts never publish the policy in either direction. Ask the school office directly whether your address’s school is enrolling at your child’s grade level before you sign anything.
Nashoba
We have no such statement from this district — which is not the same as a promise that your zoned school has room. Most districts never publish the policy in either direction. Ask the school office directly whether your address’s school is enrolling at your child’s grade level before you sign anything.
- This is the district’s own published wording, not our summary of it. Policies are rewritten between enrollment seasons and a page can be out of date the day after we read it — the school office is the only authority on whether a particular grade at a particular school is full right now.
- A warning here is about capacity, not about your address. It does not mean your child will be moved; it means the district has told you in writing that it may move them.
Comparability notes
- Cross-state comparison. Dollars below are shown both as reported and adjusted to a common price level, because a dollar buys different amounts of teacher in MT and OK.
- At least one district sits outside a metro area with its own published price index, so its cost adjustment uses the statewide index. That is a coarser adjustment.
What these numbers are, exactly
Who decides, and what it costs you
Every band above this one asks what a district spends. This one asks who chose to.
Denton Elem
The district levies its own school tax
This district raises property tax in its own name. Who sets the rate varies by state — an elected board in some, a public vote in others — but the levy is the school system’s own, and it is the part of a tax bill that school politics moves most directly.
Nashoba
The district levies its own school tax
This district raises property tax in its own name. Who sets the rate varies by state — an elected board in some, a public vote in others — but the levy is the school system’s own, and it is the part of a tax bill that school politics moves most directly.
| Denton Elem | Nashoba | |
|---|---|---|
| School property tax levied, per student Only for districts that levy in their own name. Blank where the county or town levies instead — see the cards above, and read the next row. | $7,927 | $12,889 |
| Appropriated by the county or town, per student What the parent government handed the schools, for dependent systems. This is a general appropriation, not solely property tax. | — | — |
| Property tax as a share of all revenue How much of the budget rides on local property values, and therefore on local votes. | 33.2% | 67.2% |
| Long-term debt already owed, per student The balance at the end of the year, for scale. Repaid over decades, so it is a commitment made by earlier boards rather than a bill arriving now. | Locked | Locked |
| Debt service as a share of spending Interest plus principal repaid this year, against total spending. This is the part of the debt that is being paid now, out of money that would otherwise reach a classroom. | Locked | Locked |
| New long-term debt issued, per student Money borrowed during fiscal year 2024. What this figure does and does not tell you is set out under the table. | $0 | $0 |
- Denton Elem: issued no new long-term debt in fiscal year 2024. That is a reported zero, not a gap in the data.
- Nashoba: issued no new long-term debt in fiscal year 2024. That is a reported zero, not a gap in the data.
- A figure in the borrowing row is not a bond voters approved. It records debt issued, and that includes refinancing existing debt at a new rate — which changes nothing about what a district owes — as well as certificates of participation and lease-revenue debt, which in many states a board can issue with no referendum at all. To find out what was actually on a ballot, check the county election office.
- Debt is repaid over decades. A large balance per student is a commitment made by earlier boards and earlier voters, not a bill arriving this year. The debt service row above it is the part being paid now.
What this band does not answer yet
The detailed figures for Denton Elem and Nashoba
The verdict, the headline dollar, the funding shares, who is served and every comparability caveat are free above, and stay free. What is behind the lock is the detail you would want before acting on any of it:
- capital spending per student
- total revenue and total current spending, and the funding mix in dollars (the percentage shares stay free)
- the ten-line per-student breakdown of where the money goes
- counselor and administrator ratios, and the total salary bill
- the debt behind the risk flags — per student, and as a share of spending
$1.79 for both, for three months, 21 cents less than buying them one at a time.
The 3-month unlock is a single payment and does not renew; it simply ends. A subscription renews, monthly or yearly as chosen, until you cancel. No account to create: this purchase is held in this browser, so clearing site data or moving to another browser loses it, and the phone apps sell their own unlock through their own store. What to do if you lose it.